"But," you might say, "it's cruel and heartless to hope for and applaud Elmer taking his children out with him. They're innocent! They didn't do any harm. I can see how it's a good thing when Elmer takes himself out, sure, but isn't applauding Elmer's antics that depopulate his entire family a bit much?"

In answer to this question, we here at the Stop Elmer Fudd web site would have to say yes, hoping Elmer takes out his Elmer Spawn with him is a bit much and it is a bit heartless. But we then have to ask, "So what?"

You see, there's no evil in telling Elmer he needs to put seat belts around his kids if he's going to be acting like -- well, acting like an Elmer, and when Elmer mouths off with a "fuck off, homo" to step back and smile, allowing Elmer to exterminate his Spawn along with himself if that be his wish. It's a semi-free country, after all, and the true evil would be to force Elmer to act responsibly and to behave safely if he would rather not. The true evil would be to remove from him his right to exterminate his own children if that be his wish.

And really, deep down inside, don't we all rather hope in our secret heart of hearts that the clown's genes don't get any chance to propagate?

Personally, we here at the Stop Elmer Fudd web site love to see Elmers exterminating themselves in amusing ways and dislike greatly every tragedy which hurts, harms, maims, or kills a child. Parents, after all, are Fair Game for the Fates -- so be it; we can all accept the fact and like it (and we do.)

Children, however, not only have to suffer the dangers the Fates throw at them as a matter of course, but they also have to suffer those of their parents. And when one's father is an Elmer Fudd moron, the fact remains that the Elmer is the child's parent and thus he's legally entitled to shoot them up in "hunting" trips, smash them up in dune buggies, run over them with motorcycles, and generally do just about anything to them short of incest (and even then it's acceptable in some States.)